@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 days agoBurning Upmander.xyzmessage-square518fedilinkarrow-up11.3K
arrow-up11.3KimageBurning Upmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 days agomessage-square518fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish145•10 days agoYeah, but it hits different. Smaller number is smaller. That’s why I use Kelvin. THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DEGREES?!!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish92•10 days agoDegrees? While using Kelvin?? OP is a phony!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish25•edit-210 days agoShould use Rankine with that logic. It comes out to 566.
minus-squarezitrone 🍋linkfedilinkEnglish6•9 days agoWhy not Centikelvin? THIRTY ONE THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED CENTIKELVIN??!!!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•9 days agoWho is kelvin and why the fuck are his numbers so large
Yeah, but it hits different. Smaller number is smaller.
That’s why I use Kelvin. THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DEGREES?!!
Degrees? While using Kelvin?? OP is a phony!
I’d excuse it as part of the joke
Should use Rankine with that logic. It comes out to 566.
Why not Centikelvin?
THIRTY ONE THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED CENTIKELVIN??!!!
Who is kelvin and why the fuck are his numbers so large