• 101OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    That is a very weird thing to do, unless they are looking to boost their own instance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      292 months ago

      You can read their motivation in the linked pull request. FWIW I don’t think there’s any ill intent here and certainly not an attempt to boost their own instance. I think they just want Lemmy to be decentralized and lemmy.world being as big as it is kinda prevents that.

      I’m not sure I would’ve done it that way personally but I can see the reasoning and it’s not entirely unreasonable.

      • 101OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        In my humble opinion, join lemmy should only exclude the instances that is harmful.

        They should not choose the instances to include for the users.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          132 months ago

          Lemmy.world becoming the default Lemmy instance, and it growing to outsize all other instances is a danger: it makes the Fediverse centralized, easy to take down and easy to take over.

          • 101OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The same applies to the mastodon . Social instance and the same applies really to every Fediverse software available, with the exception of pixelfed.

              • 101OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 months ago

                Pixelfed has a default limit to the number of users per instance.

                  • 101OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    42 months ago

                    I believe yes, but at the last time I checked it out no instance had open registration, matter of fact you will have to look for good time for a free instance to register on.

                    Maybe they changed it now, but 1 year ago that was the case.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 months ago

          I think I generally agree with you, but I don’t think this is a big grievance. Lemmy.world has enough traction as it is, they don’t really need the “publicity” from join-lemmy.org.

          It would’ve been better if they had written this as some kind of policy beforehand. Like if they had written somewhere before this pull request something like “any instance with more than 40% of active users may be excluded from the join-lemmy.org listing”, then it would’ve been more reasonable too.

          • Ruud
            link
            fedilink
            172 months ago

            It would have been better if they communicated to us first. I don’t disagree that user signups should be spread over instances. We now have a link to https://lemmyverse.net on our signup page so people can check if another instance would fit them better.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I posted about this in the admin chat on matrix, but you’re right the pull request was merged very quickly.

              The lemmyverse link is also a good idea, but users only see it after filling in their email and password. At that point it’s unlikely that they would cancel it and go to a different website.

              Edit: I’m now thinking to change the joinlemmy code so that any instance with more than x% of active users will automatically be hidden.