- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
I’ve decided undecided voters have low critical thinking skills and/or are attention seekers
I’ve decided undecided voters have low critical thinking skills and/or are attention seekers
in a world where the winner is decided by < 5%, 3% is quite a bit.
The implication is that 100% of that 3% votes one way.
It’s a false analysis to claim that. Using that same reasoning, you could as credibly claim that any election is decided by a single vote, the one that gives the winner the majority (or plurality). But that’s not actionable information in any way, it’s just tautologically true, as is any salami-slicing analysis.