@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 6 days agoTo help you decide on your next daily driverlemmy.worldmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1374file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1374imageTo help you decide on your next daily driverlemmy.world@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 6 days agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-26 days agoYea don’t cross post from NonCredibleDefense if you want to be taken seriously. Just look at the lengths of the children. Bit on the tall side, no? Edit: my bad. Sorry for being snarky
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•6 days agoThose aren’t the length of the children, it’s the length of the blind spot
minus-square@borflinkEnglish8•edit-26 days agoBarely a head taller than the vehicle tires, so no, they are not on the tall side If you meant “short side” consider the ages of the children and the fact that 5 and 3 year olds do exist in the real world
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•6 days agoThe pic is confusing because they used similar visual cues for vehicle “hood height” compared to child “distance from vehicle”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•6 days agoNot sure the tank periscope system was properly accounted for, either.
Yea don’t cross post from NonCredibleDefense if you want to be taken seriously.Just look at the lengths of the children. Bit on the tall side, no?
Edit: my bad. Sorry for being snarky
Those aren’t the length of the children, it’s the length of the blind spot
Barely a head taller than the vehicle tires, so no, they are not on the tall side
If you meant “short side” consider the ages of the children and the fact that 5 and 3 year olds do exist in the real world
The pic is confusing because they used similar visual cues for vehicle “hood height” compared to child “distance from vehicle”.
Its a meme lol
Not sure the tank periscope system was properly accounted for, either.