Since many in this community have a habit of resorting to personal attacks when responding to posts recently, I’ll say this: I support and respect everyone’s right to vote for who they want to.
I’m just posting this article that’s already available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy—I didn’t write it, just sharing it for discussion.
Pointing out how a moral stance leads to actual outcomes isn’t a personal attack.
I never said it was. But calling me an idiot and a troll are personal attacks. I’m fine with people disagreeing. It’s the name-calling that is out of line.
Pointing out how a moral stance leads to actual outcomes isn’t a personal attack.
I’m not acknowledging anything. I am saying she is making a lot of Lemmy users and democrats mad, so she must not be that irrelevant (which is what the poster said she was).
No, you are the one making people mad. And since it’s a fuck ton of people, you’re probably the problem. But I know realizing that would take an ounce of self reflection, which you don’t have.
Since many in this community have a habit of resorting to personal attacks when responding to posts recently, I’ll say this: I support and respect everyone’s right to vote for who they want to.
I’m just posting this article that’s already available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy—I didn’t write it, just sharing it for discussion.
Pointing out how a moral stance leads to actual outcomes isn’t a personal attack. You’re not a victim here.
I never said it was. But calling me an idiot and a troll are personal attacks. I’m fine with people disagreeing. It’s the name-calling that is out of line.
You are fine with people disagreeing because making people mad makes you giddy. I’ve suggested therapy and I still do.
She’s irrelevant. The only thing to discuss is why she keeps trying to divide the left and not actually accomplish anything.
Well she sure is making a lot of Lemmy users and democrats mad, so she must not be that irrelevant.
So you acknowledge that’s what she does? Split the left?
I’m not acknowledging anything. I am saying she is making a lot of Lemmy users and democrats mad, so she must not be that irrelevant (which is what the poster said she was).
It’s possible to be irrelevant and infuriating at the same time.
But if she was so irrelevant, seems it would be tough to be infuriating. I mean, if she’s irrelevant, then everyone could just ignore her. Right?
Nothing you say is true
No, you are the one making people mad. And since it’s a fuck ton of people, you’re probably the problem. But I know realizing that would take an ounce of self reflection, which you don’t have.