Remember to take shitposts seriously, it’s what the cool kids are doing

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 months ago

    That’s a very good question. It’s as anarchist as modern social media gets.

    The thing is the moderators. In an anarchist utopia, they would take turns, be recallable and have to justify their decisions.

    The last point is true for some instances but not all (think of the vegan cat food debate on .world verses how .ml blocks voices critical of China and Russia).

    The other two points – to my knowledge – barely happen. This isn’t a huge problem, as I said, it’s as anarchist as social media comes. But it contains the risk of a centralized power. Sure, you can always leave the instance (even easier than on mastodon where you lose your followers) but this resembles the Libertarian “freedom” to choose your oppressor. Internal equality is very important.

    This isn’t to criticize Lemmy. It’s overall very good and as anarchist as realistically and practically possible. But to showcase the anarchist ideal of councils and to spotlight the minor flaws we should be aware of, even if there is no perfect solution.