@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agounwatchable!!mander.xyzmessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up11.08K
arrow-up11.08Kimageunwatchable!!mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoThe implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive. I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoI think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other
The implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive.
I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
I think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other