Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you’re claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you’ve seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.
Well if you had the proof you would have taken your easy victory already, since you seem firmly against backing up your claims im just gonna cut out, reinforced in my belief that this court decision was coordinated democratic sabotage.
Removed by mod
Do you have the packet to see? I want to see whats so clear about it being invalid
Removed by mod
Ive only seen articles on the ruling. Link me to the packet please
Removed by mod
Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you’re claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you’ve seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.
Removed by mod
Well if you had the proof you would have taken your easy victory already, since you seem firmly against backing up your claims im just gonna cut out, reinforced in my belief that this court decision was coordinated democratic sabotage.
Removed by mod