Ok, this is nearly a collage level class in how to identify AI images. Well done, Thank you! (no sarcasm, I really like the way you analyzed the image.)
I’ve seen deep couches like that for sale. It’s not that odd. Also, I don’t find it shocking that a porn studio would have deeper couches for more room to roll around on lol.
Look at the chain around her neck each link is perfectly detailed
Look at her hands, they have the normal amount of fingers
Look at her vagina, it looks like a vagina, that’s actually kind of rare if it were ai
The lighting is studio lighting rather than this weird ambient lighting that most if not all ai has
The skin is pale rather than very tan like most ai
Look at how her breast has proper fluid dynamics in her hand
Look at all the subtle moles on her skin
Look at how the pattern on her socks matches on both and is actually consistently spaced
Look at how the couch deforms where she’s sitting and changes color where her sock has dragged
Look at how nothing in the background looks like it’s melting or is hard to make out
The glass covering the lamps is normal and not completely fucked
No, this is not ai, by a long shot
Ok, this is nearly a collage level class in how to identify AI images. Well done, Thank you! (no sarcasm, I really like the way you analyzed the image.)
No problem!
Removed by mod
Dude, she plainly has a human amount of fingers. The shot is done with a wide angle lense which is the problem with perspective you’re having.
There’s nothing about this that is even slightly suspicious.
I’ve seen deep couches like that for sale. It’s not that odd. Also, I don’t find it shocking that a porn studio would have deeper couches for more room to roll around on lol.
Removed by mod
The photo is watermarked from the studio and the models name is the title of the post. Yes, we can blame you.