Please note this is just a beta and there are going to be bugs, but it works and it works nicely. Have fun.

  • Dettweiler
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    It’s a nice app, but so is Jerboa, which does not have ads. If there was a one-time ad-free purchase; I would strongly consider it; but I’m not going to pay a subscription to avoid ads on an already ad-free website.

      • Dettweiler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’s out now, and it’s $20. Way too steep of a price for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        That makes me nervous for how much he’s going to charge… I paid like $8 for the last one I used on reddit for ten years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -101 year ago

        How is it “in the works”? It’s not hard to implement, seeing as how he already did it.

        And no timeline when it’s coming just a promise it will?

        Sounds more like he just wants to test the waters and see what he can make.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The dev don’t want to charge money while the app is still buggy. The subscription option is there for the die hard fans who keep pestering him to let them send their money. If it weren’t for people pestering him, the option to subscribe is probably not even offered right now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I don’t know. Going by that logic, there should not be any ads in the beta as well as the app is not officially finished. That way people can use and try the app until the official launch and then buy it when the one time ad free purchase options are added without being exposed to our tracked by ads.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Can’t argue with that, I’ll go that route if it were me, but ultimately it’s the app creator’s decision.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Because he prioritized his time in getting the application usable rather than implementing various tiers of payments instead.

          One of the messages to the discord this morning seems to indicate he’s planning on adding the one time ad-free unlock today.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            He literally already has all the other tiers of payment, though? You can select “per month” or “per year”, you just don’t have an option for one-time.

          • SRo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Honestly a third sub option for lifetime wouldn’t have been a timesink. Just like the old version had. I guess it was more of a time waste removing the third option.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          If it’s not so hard then why aren’t you making your own awesome app in your free time and giving it away without ads?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      I believe the developer is working on a one-time payment Pro version that removes ads. Ultra has additional features for a subscription fee.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is also the dev that got really hurt over his paying customers not liking when he completely changed the app they paid for under their nose with no option to roll back, and quit pushing updates for a while after that. It was a whole thing.

      I’m not paying a dev that can’t handle feedback and has an entire fanclub cheering on literally every single decision.