• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 hours ago

      Are you saying that something helping the republicans isn’t a threat to democrats? Or are you saying it’s not enough to help because you’ve already forgotten the lesson from 2000?

      • Cadeillac
        link
        fedilink
        English
        120 minutes ago

        Why are you making stuff up?

        the votes of Florida voters themselves show that Ralph Nader was not responsible for George W. Bush’s presidency

        What does Florida’s fuckery have to do with independents?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 hours ago

          No… Because I’m only referring to one post.

          He’s wrong anyway, the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties, but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans.

          I’ll break it down for you. The first part of the post literally says this:

          the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties

          And then the very next part of the same sentence is:

          but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans

          Which is exactly what I pointed out. It starts by saying the green party isn’t a threat and then gives the exact reason why it is a threat.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              25 hours ago

              Chill? I’m not heated. Clearly it was a misunderstanding, that’s why I explained it. I didn’t mean any disrespect.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                23 hours ago

                Fair enough. I see what you mean now. I realized I probably read a tone into your response that wasn’t there and that is why I deleted my response. Thanks for your patience