Five to [email protected]English • 2 months agoWeaponizing ordinary devices violates international law, United Nations rights chief saysapnews.commessage-square217fedilinkarrow-up1803
arrow-up1803external-linkWeaponizing ordinary devices violates international law, United Nations rights chief saysapnews.comFive to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square217fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months ago Didn’t you say they were the ones who reported your non-Hezbollah casualty figure though? I don’t have any “non-Hezbollah casualty figures.” I’m assuming that any casualties Hezbollah doesn’t claim are the civilians. You could just link to what you’re talking about I’m still not understand what you’re finding unclear.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish11•2 months agoYou’ve not sourced your 0.1% figure. Safe to assume there is none.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoThe source is Hezbollah. As I’ve told you.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•2 months agoThis is the most infuriating comment section I have ever seen.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoDefense of Israel is effectively banned on Lemmy
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•2 months agoDude. You keep making the same definitive statement over and over and then when asked to back it up, give this “who? what?” routine. Why anyone is even engaging with you, I don’t know. Yet here I am.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoI did back it up. I can’t make people read it, though
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•2 months agoTheir handler only ever told them the source was Hezbollah, so they don’t really know where to go from here. It’s why their script keeps looping.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agohttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2kn10xxldo
I don’t have any “non-Hezbollah casualty figures.” I’m assuming that any casualties Hezbollah doesn’t claim are the civilians.
I’m still not understand what you’re finding unclear.
You’ve not sourced your 0.1% figure. Safe to assume there is none.
The source is Hezbollah. As I’ve told you.
This is the most infuriating comment section I have ever seen.
Defense of Israel is effectively banned on Lemmy
Dude. You keep making the same definitive statement over and over and then when asked to back it up, give this “who? what?” routine. Why anyone is even engaging with you, I don’t know. Yet here I am.
One must imagine @AugustWest as happy
I did back it up. I can’t make people read it, though
Removed by mod
Their handler only ever told them the source was Hezbollah, so they don’t really know where to go from here. It’s why their script keeps looping.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2kn10xxldo
Yeah but Hezbollah are worse akshually