@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoWe lost Keanumander.xyzmessage-square216fedilinkarrow-up1449
arrow-up1449imageWe lost Keanumander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square216fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish35•2 months agoYes but he didn’t say reverse nepotism he said reverse nepobaby as it wasn’t the parent getting the child a job but the other way round. It’s still nepotism but nepobaby is a more specific term.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoMy man corrected it. Now it says “reverse nepotism baby”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoThe AI went back in time and changed what was posted. Saw it happen to a guy in NC last week.
Yes but he didn’t say reverse nepotism he said reverse nepobaby as it wasn’t the parent getting the child a job but the other way round. It’s still nepotism but nepobaby is a more specific term.
My man corrected it. Now it says “reverse nepotism baby”
It was never edited lol.
The AI went back in time and changed what was posted. Saw it happen to a guy in NC last week.