@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 15 hours agoDreams come truemander.xyzmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1487
arrow-up1487imageDreams come truemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 15 hours agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareApathy TreelinkfedilinkEnglish21•14 hours agoDo they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
minus-squareJake FarmlinkfedilinkEnglish23•14 hours agoIf it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•13 hours agoAnyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
minus-squareJake FarmlinkfedilinkEnglish6•9 hours agoFor profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 hours agoAnd yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 hour agoAgreed that you should have some kind of “service” on your CV, but reviewing is pretty low impact. And if you want to review, you can choose something other than the predatory publishers.
And they expect you to do this for free?
deleted by creator
Maybe check the other comments.
Do they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
If it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
Nah, they get “Exposure”!
/s
Anyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
For profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
And yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
Agreed that you should have some kind of “service” on your CV, but reviewing is pretty low impact. And if you want to review, you can choose something other than the predatory publishers.