Taylor & Francis and Wiley sold out their researchers in bulk, this should be a crime.

Researchers need to be able to consent or refuse to consent and science need to be respected more than that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    552 months ago

    Daily reminder that copyright isn’t the only conceivable weapon we can wield against AI.

    Anticompetitive business practices, labor law, privacy, likeness rights. There are plenty of angles to attack from.

    Most importantly, we need strong unions. However we model AI regulation, we will still want some ability to grant training rights. But it can’t be a boilerplate part of an employment/contracting agreement. That’s the kind of thing unions are made to handle.

    • @RamblingPanda
      link
      132 months ago

      Look, I’m not against AI and automation in general. I’m not against losing my job either. We should use this as tools to overcome scarcity, use it for the better future of all of humanity. I don’t mind losing my job if I could use my time to do things I love. But that won’t happen as long as greedy ass companies use it against us.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        We conquered our resource scarcity problem years ago. Artificial scarcity still exists in society because we haven’t conquered our greed problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        Both of you argue from the flawed assumption that AI actually has the potential that marketing people trying to bullshit you say it has. It doesn’t.

        • @RamblingPanda
          link
          32 months ago

          AI has its usage. Not the ones people cream their pants about, but to say it’s useless is just wrong. But people tend to misunderstand what AI, ML, and whatever else is. Just like everyone was celebrating the cloud without knowing what the cloud was ten, twenty years ago.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            It has its uses but none of them include anything even close to replacing entire jobs or even significant portions of jobs.

            • @RamblingPanda
              link
              22 months ago

              I disagree, but I might have different experiences.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            It doesn’t matter what it’s good for. What matters is what the MBA parasites think it’s good for.

            They will impulsively replace jobs, and then when it fails, try to rehire at lower wages.