@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 day agoLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.commessage-square191fedilinkarrow-up1568
arrow-up1568external-linkLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.com@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 day agomessage-square191fedilink
minus-squarestinerman [Ohio]linkfedilinkEnglish9•14 hours agoIn California, it doesn’t matter because the results are already known. In other states the calculus is a bit different.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•10 hours agoOnline rhetoric sways voters in swing states. Your vote may not change the outcome, but your words might.
minus-squarestinerman [Ohio]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-29 hours agoThat’s absolutely true, especially for a paper like the LA Times. I am dubious that there is any appreciable effect when it comes to random blogs and so forth.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•13 hours agoRight? Imagine believing there are enough conscientious progressives / leftists to flip CA red because of third party voting. Sure, Jan.
In California, it doesn’t matter because the results are already known. In other states the calculus is a bit different.
Online rhetoric sways voters in swing states. Your vote may not change the outcome, but your words might.
Good!
I must have really pissed you off huh?
Not at all.
That’s absolutely true, especially for a paper like the LA Times. I am dubious that there is any appreciable effect when it comes to random blogs and so forth.
Right? Imagine believing there are enough conscientious progressives / leftists to flip CA red because of third party voting. Sure, Jan.