The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has gained ground in three recent state elections, caused an uproar in the Thuringian parliament and triggering another debate on whether to ban the party outright.

  • Jeena
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1612 hours ago

    Banning one of the the biggest democratic parties to save democracy.

    I wonder how that would go. It’s the paradox that you have to be intolerant to intolerance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 hour ago

      You getting downvoted shows how hypocrite the internet collective is. Democracy for everyone unless they don’t like the result.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 hours ago

      The last time they tried to ban a party in Germany was the NPD (another Nazi party) and at the end the Supreme Court decided the reason not to ban them, even though they were clearly unconstitutional , was because they were to few/insignificant (in the end they banned them from receiving party funding which still has a massive effect).

      So you couldnt ban them because they were to small and you can’t ban the AfD because they’re to big? Just because enough people vote for a party doesn’t mean they’re not unconstitutional.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7612 hours ago

      There is no paradox.

      Tolerance is a social contract that both guides and protects your actions. If you breach that contract by being a cunt then you are no longer afforded it’s protections for the same.

      Nazis demand you accept them while demonising others and will continue to take advantage of you being “tolerant” for as long as you allow it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5612 hours ago

      one the biggest parties

      FTFY, there is nothing remotely democratic about those people.

    • @RamblingPanda
      link
      English
      3212 hours ago

      Those laws exist for a reason, we had some experiences in the past.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 hours ago

      We banned the fascist party in my country for 20 years. It accounted something like 55-60 % of the votes, back in the day.

      It didn’t work well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 hours ago

          Argentina. Peronism got proscribed for ~20 years (1955-1973). It’s a lot more complicated than that cause it actually was fascist vs conservatives*.

          Ellected governments had little to no real power cause +50% of the people were not allowed to vote, so the faction that started winning power was the military. Every excuse was a good one to take down the government and bring up another dictatorship.

          *refined fascists

    • TimeSquirrel
      link
      fedilink
      511 hours ago

      Anybody can come to the party as long as you bring your own beer.

      The AfD brought crack.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 hours ago

      The first half of your comment seems to be critical of banning a party, as if it damages democracy. But then in your second half, you reference the paradox or tolerance, which implies you are in favor of banning the AfD.