Maybe I’m wrong, English is my third language though …

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 hours ago

    Using it as an adjective, to mean “has a pleasing aesthetic.”

    Isn’t that the proper usage?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 hours ago

      No, “aesthetic” is generally just a noun, historically. As in “it has a modern/minimalist/cyberpunk aesthetic.” Its usage as an adjective just means “relating to the general idea of aesthetics as a field of study,” or “someone with a strong sense of and attunement to the design and beauty of things.” Using it to just mean “beautiful,” basically, is a new usage in just the last 5 years or less.

      • Zos_Kia
        link
        24 hours ago

        It might come from non native speakers too. For example in french using aesthetic as an adjective to mean “beautiful” is correct, and it may be true in other romance languages.

      • @Anyolduser
        link
        25 hours ago

        Then your example should have been “this house is aesthetic”. Aesthetic is being used as an adjective.

        Saying “this house has a pleasing aesthetic” is correct. Aesthetic is being used as a noun. “Pleasing” is the adjective. While the aesthetic is not defined enough to your liking, it isn’t being used as an adjective.

        Use your original wording and replace the word “aesthetic” with the word “quality”. “This house has a pleasing quality” is a proper sentence. Sure, there’s ambiguity as to what that quality is (is it the shape of it? Is it the color? Perhaps the landscaping?), but it isn’t grammatically incorrect.

        • AmidFuror
          link
          fedilink
          25 hours ago

          Using it as an adjective, to mean “has a pleasing aesthetic.”

          The commenter was telling you how they use it, not giving an example. The commenter told you what the adjective means.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 hours ago

          ? You’re saying exactly the same thing I am. I was giving a definition, not an example. Admittedly confusing since I used the (real) word in its own (slang) definition.

          • @Anyolduser
            link
            14 hours ago

            Yeah, I missed “to mean”. Looks like at least one other guy did, too.