• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93 hours ago

    I don’t live in a 3rd world country, so I guess I just don’t understand the concept of needing to arm myself before leaving my house because I’m likely to need a deadly weapon while I go about my business.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I don’t live in a 3rd world country

      lol the US has the highest death rate from gun violence - it’s literally the #1 killer of children.

      which is not to assert that adding more firearms will help the situation, but it’s got fuckall to do with living in a first world country or third world country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        350 minutes ago

        As an aside: part of the definition of a First World Country includes being a “stable democracy”.

        If a poll was done of American citizens asking them “do you think fraud will play a part in the upcoming election?” I would be shocked if less than 80% said yes. That doesn’t sound like a stable democracy to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 hour ago

        In these kinds of discussions you can assume the third world country jab was a reference to the US.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      What country do you live in? I’m curious which one has no theft or violent crime.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Not OP check out my username for an idea of where I live. Besides a bit of gang on gang action in our capital, violent crimes are extremely rare. It’s maybe once a year that police have to shoot at a person, and even then police officers will assess the situation and if possible not go for center mass.

        Note how I left out theft. That’s because you can’t directly use violence to protect property.

        • capital
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 hour ago

          Note how I left out theft. That’s because you can’t directly use violence to protect property.

          I remember hearing this when I lived in the UK for a few years and I was blown away. What are you expected to do if being robbed? Let it happen?

            • capital
              link
              fedilink
              English
              151 minutes ago

              Yeah, not here.

              I’ve had shit stolen. The police “handled it” to an extent but we will never get back priceless family heirlooms given to us from my wife’s side of the family. Fuck thieves.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            253 minutes ago

            Call the police. Are you in physical danger? If not why are you putting yourself in physical danger?

            • capital
              link
              fedilink
              English
              151 minutes ago

              I don’t think I understand your question.

              What scenario are you imagining with these questions?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 minutes ago

        There’s a difference between “violent crime exists” and “violent crime is so prevalent that regular citizens need to carry around an implement designed to kill people quickly while they go about their daily lives.”

        • capital
          link
          fedilink
          English
          129 minutes ago

          I’ve never been in a serious vehicle accident.

          Still wear my seat belt though.