• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Was my statement wrong in any way?

    Do you know how analogies work? Of course the two things I compared are different.

    That doesn’t answer my question as to if my statement was incorrect.

    You’ve made an analogy about preparedness and let the assumption hang that that makes both things equal.

    Just like saying “a fish swimming is like a bird flying” isn’t an argument that a bird would be able to fly underwater, saying “I’ve never been in an accident and still wear a seatbelt” is not an argument for “always have a deadly weapon on you when you leave the house” not being evidence of a completely fucked up situation.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You’ve made an analogy about preparedness and let the assumption hang that that makes both things equal.

      No. It doesn’t do that at all. Nothing in my comment should be construed as to equate the wearing of seat belts and the carrying of firearms. They are different things, meant for different purposes, with different consequences for their misuse.

      The analogy demonstrated ways in which they are the same - having it and not needing it is usually what happens and needing it and not having it can be very bad.

      Edit: Y’all think Eliza Fletcher would have been better off carrying that day?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        So completely irrelevant to the topic that “Needing to have a gun on you just to be prepared for your day is fucked up.”

        • capital
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Okay, sure. I wish people didn’t steal, kill, and rape too but it happens. Just the reality.

            • capital
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Sorry, are you implying it isn’t?

              Just say what you mean.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                Instead of arming civilians for vigilantism pressure should be put on the government to deal with the root causes of criminal behaviour.

                As far as I was aware the legal punishment for theft wasn’t the death penalty, but here you are saying a citizen dealing out that punishment without a judge or jury isn’t only acceptable but should be actively encouraged.

                • capital
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  Instead of arming civilians for vigilantism pressure should be put on the government to deal with the root causes of criminal behaviour.

                  Sure, I advocate for that too. Until then…

                  As far as I was aware the legal punishment for theft wasn’t…

                  There’s one weird trick to not being shot for stealing shit.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 months ago

                    There’s one weird trick to not being shot for stealing shit.

                    You’re just trying to deflect from my statement:
                    The criminal punishment for theft is not the death penalty, and you are actively encouraging vigilantism issuing death sentences without a judge or jury.