Well, this just got darker.

  • circuscritic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No, I am saying that sharing fantasies about underage children with a shady and poorly designed AI porn site, shows a serious lack of judgement and impulse control.

    For that reason, yeah, they probably deserve having a quick review of their life to make sure that’s the only poor choice they’ve made in regards to that particular fantasy.

    And they weren’t just reading, they were prompting the LLM model to generate these specific fantasies. They didn’t just come across a fucked up website and read a few forum posts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      472 months ago

      If we investigated everyone with poor impulse control, we’d be investigating 80% of the world.

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 months ago

        80% of the world shares their pedophile fantasies with shoddy AI LLM porn sites…?

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          272 months ago

          bro we got literal pedophiles roaming the streets… catholic church, other “churches”, hollywood and youtube “influencers” all have known pedophiles WHO NOT BEING PROSECUTED FOR THE CRIMES THEY ALREADY COMMITTED

          But you want state resources wasted what is essentially a thought crime or because “they might be pedophiles”?

          🤡

          Idiots can’t even properly ID the threat… no wonder country is going down the drain.

          • circuscritic
            link
            fedilink
            English
            132 months ago

            no sex crimes should be investigated until the Catholic Church and Hollywood have been purged of pedophiles

            Well, that’s certainly an opinion.

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              172 months ago

              do you have evidence of a sex crime?

              if so, please report to your local prosecutor and police.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                That’s a curious new benchmark for posting comments and opinions on this subject. You can only do so if you also have case files and evidence to forward to local prosecutors and police of crimes in your area.

                • sunzu2
                  link
                  fedilink
                  72 months ago

                  For that reason, yeah, they probably deserve having a quick review of their life to make sure that’s the only poor choice they’ve made in regards to that particular fantasy.

                  my comment addressed this idiotic statement…

                • sunzu2
                  link
                  fedilink
                  122 months ago

                  Are you defending the people who used the AI bots as described?

                  🤡

                  No, I am telling you it is not a crime… learn to read and stop making shit up.

                  If you care about sex crimes against children, there are plenty of that happening within your community, tough internet guy…

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    42 months ago

                    Lmao…if you don’t see how going “Hey it’s not actually a crime!” sounds like defending them, I can’t help you.

                    And “internet tough guy”? Where is that even coming from? Lol

          • SharkAttak
            link
            fedilink
            72 months ago

            I heard even a US president is one… and still walks free.

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              52 months ago

              Yes, clinton and trump both flew on Esptain plane… nothing was done.

              Ruling class and their regime whores seem to get away with whatever but we got normies wanting FEDS to investigate chat logs of incels to “save the kids, just in case”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m just saying, police investigation of fiction creators and readers for the content of their fiction is way over the line of a lot of social and political norms.

      (Also, I think you’ll find that police abuse children a lot more than pervy fiction fans do; so really, who should be investigating whom? Investigation into crime is supposed to start with evidence that a crime actually occurred — not with your personal disgust towards someone’s reading matter.)

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You’re really going to great lengths to ignore what I’ve been saying, and instead responding to whatever strawman you find most convenient.

        Now you’ve moved onto, “why should police investigate pedophiles, when they are the real pedophiles. In fact, the pedophile fantasy users of the site should be investigating the police”.

        I mean, do you even hear yourself?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I hate torture-porn movies like the Saw series, but a lot of people are fans of them. Should I worry that those people are likely to commit kidnapping, torture, and murder? Should I advocate that the makers or watchers of those movies be investigated for kidnapping, torture, and murder — without any evidence that a crime was committed?

          We don’t send the cops after people for liking murder stories, theft stories, industrial sabotage stories, or treason stories. We shouldn’t send the cops after people for liking stories of Harry Potter getting fucked by Severus Snape either.

          I think you should be more careful to distinguish fantasy from reality. Most fiction readers and writers have no problem doing so.

          • circuscritic
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 months ago

            Strawman, strawman, strawman.

            Even when I reiterate that we’re not talking about passive consumption of media, but active participation in something else entirely, you can’t help but ignore that, and continue lobbing out fallacy after fallacy.

            Maybe you should reread my original comments, and see why your comments have been so pointless, bordering on disingenuous.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              262 months ago

              So you’re into sending the police after the writers, directors, and producers of the Saw movies, but not the audiences?

              I dunno man, that’s still too fascist for my tastes, but you can keep fantasizing about it. I promise I won’t try to send the police after you for your perverted fantasies of state power.

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              132 months ago

              You don’t understand what you are talking about. Legally or otherwise.