@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agoNo ads here!lemmy.worldmessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up1988
arrow-up1988imageNo ads here!lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square166fedilink
minus-squareChemical WonkalinkfedilinkEnglish9•1 month agoUntil Google demanded from its vassal (Mozilla) the removal of support for extensions. Mozilla doesn’t have enough resources to do without Google
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•edit-21 month agoI have no idea why you’re getting down voted. It’s essentially true. The arrangement is vital for Mozilla. According to the Mozilla Foundation’s 2021–2022 financial statement, which is the most recent one published, $510 million out of its $593 million in revenue came courtesy of Google’s search payments. https://fortune.com/2024/08/05/mozilla-firefox-biggest-potential-loser-google-antitrust-search-ruling/
minus-squareChemical WonkalinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 month agoUnfortunately it happens more frequently than I’d like
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 month agoSo open themselves up for more antitrust lawsuits? Telling another browser what to do.
Until Google demanded from its vassal (Mozilla) the removal of support for extensions. Mozilla doesn’t have enough resources to do without Google
When did this happen?
I have no idea why you’re getting down voted. It’s essentially true.
Unfortunately it happens more frequently than I’d like
So open themselves up for more antitrust lawsuits? Telling another browser what to do.