• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    No.

    With what logic are you using that all those votes could just be added to Hillary? It’s not how that works. You can just say if it had been completely different it would have been completely different.

    It’s like reaching into a bag and pulling 5 limes and saying if only they had been oranges you could have made orange juice.

    She wants money, sure, and loves to grift off the people that think themselves superior but this is bad math and pure conspiracy at this point.

    Edit: No answer just downvotes cause there isn’t a logical answer just irrational dogpiling to find a scapegoat to appease some strong anxiety. Take a breath. Regroup. Don’t start throwing shit now.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      Somehow Johnson winning more voters with more money than the Green is checks notes proof the Greens are unbashedly evil. Libertarians get more money, are on every state’s ballot, but somehow are never blamed for when Democrats run bad candidates who prop up fascists and ignore swing states.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      No answer just downvotes cause there isn’t a logical answer just irrational dogpiling

      It’s inconceivable that a voter wouldn’t support either major candidate. All green voters become Hilary voters because Democrats and Greens are next to each other on my Ideology For Eighth Graders rubric.

      All you have to do is arrest Jill Stein and put her in “friendly with Russia” jail, and Hilary wins in a 0.1% landslide