• Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    1551 day ago

    I can’t believe they made that.

    Although I’m sick of hearing about that turd, the fact that his campaign people are calling for it to go away kind of makes me want to see it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      631 day ago

      Yeah i really have no intention at all of watching this. But the lead actors are great, and the pushback from Trump make it tempting.

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      37
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Reportedly, one of the financial backers kept it from being distributed because he thought it was going to portray Trump in a flattering light (edit: and was angry that it didn’t). The only reason it’s now being released is because his share was bought out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 day ago

        That’s not what I’ve heard. The movie’s creator recently gave an interview on the The New Yorker Radio Hour, where he cited as one of the difficulties the film faced with financial backers and distributors that it included a scene of Trump raping Ivana Trump (a claim she later recanted under pressure from Trump’s lawyers).

        • Billiam
          link
          fedilink
          2224 hours ago

          That’s what I’m talking about, as well as scenes showing Trump using amphetamines.

          Dan Snyder, who donated over $1 million to Trump’s campaign and also backed this film, was reportedly angry about the negative portrayals of Trump. He kept fighting the release of the movie until his company’s stake in the film was bought out, which is why it’s being shown now.

          Source.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            321 hours ago

            Ah, gotcha. The podcast doesn’t make it sound so drastic, but it goes in a similar direction.