• bobburger
    link
    fedilink
    417 hours ago

    This is absolutely correct. I’m sure the 40% of voters who want to keep sending weapons to Israel aren’t even Harris voters. So clearly the Democratic party is only doing it for the love of genocide and it seems obvious that after they finish the genocide in Gaza and Lebanon they’ll shift their focus to genocide of Palestinians and other arabs living in America. This is completely unacceptable to me which is why I voted for Trump.

    I thought about voting for a third party but I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      17 hours ago

      A lot of my relatives died in concentration camps. Why the hell are you trivializing them?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Sooooo… because you can’t be bothered to understand how things work. You voted for someone that suggests that Israel “finish the job.”

      That sure showed those pesky libs!

      You’re about as bad-faith as it gets. You’re MAGA, through and through. Drop the act that it has anything to do with genocide.

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      814 hours ago

      “Koncentration Kamp Kamala”

      Listen to yourself. You’re beyond delusional. Seek help.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      517 hours ago

      I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

      I could no more vote Trump ‘tactically’ than I could Harris. I think one ought vote according to one’s concience. The whole notion of tactical voting makes a mockery of democracy, if no one could be persuaded to vote tactically there’d be significantly less ‘electioneering’. More like the Nordic model, with way more parties catering to a broader range of political views.

      You only have to look at the current Democrat campaign, they barely need a policy at all, they’re running almost entirely on being not-Trump.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        44 minutes ago

        Ignores all the policy announcements Kamala made, complains that there aren’t any policies.

        But yes, actually, being not Trump is an excellent reason to vote for Kamala, because there are only two possible outcomes of this election, and one of them is a wannabe dictator, KKK-supporting, idiot putin stooge, racist, hate-filled, selfish, duplicitous, personally disloyal, insurrectionist, unamerican, country betraying, diaper-wearing emotional crybaby thrower of money at the already super-rich, and frankly I’m tired of people pretending that he doesn’t desperately need keeping out of the White House.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          6 minutes ago

          there are only two possible outcomes of this election

          And there’s the problem with all these responses in a nutshell. Shortsightedness.

          Yes, there’s only two possible outcomes to this election, and yes Kamala is the better candidate by miles. But your voting actions don’t only affect this election, they affect all future elections. They’re the background against which all political strategy is determined.

          If you just bend over every time you’re threatened with four years of some fuckwit in office, then you’ve committed to a political system where your opinion on policy ceases to be relevant. All that’s required for a complete autocracy is for one party to be a unbearable fascist and then the other party doesn’t even have to consider what the electorate actually think because they’re the not-fascists, and that’s all that’s needed.

          And this isn’t even slippery-slope. It’s happening right now. The not-fascists are actually complicit in war crimes and are still getting your vote . How much worse will it be in four year’s time after they’ve had it proven to work? Why would they ever listen to the electorate on anything ever again?