• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1623 hours ago

    Anecdote isn’t worthless, it just takes a lot of it to become credible.

    Like, think of an anecdote like a single study - doesn’t carry much weight, but may indicate that further investigation is called for. A shit ton of anecdotes all making a similar claim - now we’ve got peer review that may actually add up to something significant. It also may not, but the more it builds momentum without being debunked, the more likely it is to be actually getting at something real.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      119 minutes ago

      I agree that anecdotes aren’t worthless, but for different reasons. There’s actually a saying that goes, “the plural of anecdote isn’t data.” Anecdotes are just stories. They aren’t data points and they aren’t peer reviewed. If you want to turn anecdotes into data, you have to do the proper interviews and surveys to actually build a dataset and then get the peer review, but at that point we aren’t talking about anecdotes anymore.

    • @Big_Boss_77
      link
      English
      315 hours ago

      Doesn’t a “lot of anecdotal evidence” eventually become a sample set?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        117 minutes ago

        Not unless someone methodologically captures all the accounts through interviews and surveys and turns it into one.