• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    423 days ago

    If your insurance only covers 50% of the property value it is essentially useless.

    This is absolutely insane.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      50% of a seven-figure number is still at least a six-figure number. Very useful, definitely not essentially useless. If you disagree, please give me six figures, which you apparently don’t need, so I can test the theory.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 day ago

        Yeah I’m sure every home destroyed was worth over a million. That’s just a straw man.

        My home insurance in the UK covers the full cost of tearing down and rebuilding if the house is damaged beyond repair. As it bloody should.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 days ago

      My in-laws learned this the hard way after a total loss fire. Their insurance covered the current value of the house, not the cost to move/replace it in a total loss scenario, so now they have a big mortgage for their new house when the old one was nearly entirely paid off

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      223 days ago

      Wait until you hear about the deductible… where I am (not earthquake country by any means) the deductible was $80k. I sad pass on that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 days ago

        Ah so just purchase more insurance for the things the insurance I already pay for doesn’t cover?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 days ago

          Absolutely. It is also never a bad idea to have at least 6 months in expenses saved up in cash for emergencies. And another 10 thousand to keep an attorney on retainer.