@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 days agoConcurrency is not parallelismgo.devmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up192
arrow-up192external-linkConcurrency is not parallelismgo.dev@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 days agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink19•4 days agoYeah it always bothered me that they’re saying “concurrency is not concurrency”. I’m going to start using “multitasking” instead. That’s so much better. Who’s with me?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•4 days agoI will typically use the terms asynchronous and parallel when discussing the concepts, but I hadn’t thought about using multitasking until I saw that comment. I mean, even C# calls them “tasks”.
Yeah it always bothered me that they’re saying “concurrency is not concurrency”.
I’m going to start using “multitasking” instead. That’s so much better. Who’s with me?
I will typically use the terms asynchronous and parallel when discussing the concepts, but I hadn’t thought about using multitasking until I saw that comment. I mean, even C# calls them “tasks”.