But removing Denuvo DRM after 12 weeks ‘causes zero mean total revenue loss.’

    • @leftzero
      link
      English
      65 hours ago

      “Does it have denuvo (or any other form of malware, including microtransactions)” should be the first question.

      If the answer is yes, never look at it again, and permanently blacklist both developer and publisher.

      If the answer is no, then go on with the rest of the diagram.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 hours ago

      Not everybody follows that same diagram.

      On one end of things, many people don’t care at all if a game has Denuvo.

      On the other end, many pirates won’t buy a game they pirated even if they liked playing it.

      • nivellian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 hour ago

        “Many” so what’s your source for this?

        Also I have bought a bunch of games and I still pirate sometimes what are you talking.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          58 minutes ago

          What’s yours? This whole “pirates are also buyers” is just a cop-out, but sure your anecdotic experience is valid proof against the more logical alternative

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          148 minutes ago

          Common sense logic kinda dictates that once people have obtained a product, they’re unlikely to go back an pay for the same product even if they liked what they got the first time. The only outlier I have seen, is with small(er) indie games where people are more likely to offer support. Someone pirating a AAA title, liking it and then buying it shortly after at full retail is pretty rare i would say.

    • sag
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 hours ago

      Why anyone want to play the game they hate?