• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 month ago

    A study comparing the environmental impacts of various single-use beverage containers has concluded that glass bottles have a greater overall impact than plastic bottles

    But… but… Glass is not single use. That is the whole point. I don’t like this article.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 month ago

      But… but… Glass is not single use.

      When used for mass-produced beverages it very much is. Hell, plenty of beverages still use disposable glass bottles today, and that’s not even getting into the fact that glass bottles use to be the standard, which is part of the reason why there’s so much nostalgia around them.

      In the same vein, plastic is not inherently single-use. If we’re comparing multi-use plastic and multi-use glass, then the same calculus applies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        181 month ago

        But in the meme it’s the kind of milk bottle you return to the store for $ and they wash and refill it. Not really covered by that study I don’t think

        glass bottles have a more damaging overall effect, largely because they are heavier and require more energy for their production.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 month ago

        Lots of countries have deposits on bottles and they will very much be reused. If that’s not being done it’s a cultural/political problem not a glass bottle problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 month ago

        It’s mostly just the us that no longer have recycling for bottles. Most modern countries have automated collection machines.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            I know, what I’m saying is no glass bottle is explicitly non recyclable there’s just a lack of ability to recycle in the us for whatever dumb business monster reasoning.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 month ago

              Single-use bottles includes recyclable bottles. The point of single-use is that they’re discarded in some way by the consumer at the end of use, including discarded via recycling, not retained.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 month ago

                  They’re only single use if they aren’t recycled, the article states that as well.

                  … would you care to quote that, because I’m pretty sure it says otherwise.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 month ago

                    But as these bottles are largely single-use, many of them are discarded and dumped in the earth’s ecosystems, where they constitute a significant portion of all environmental waste.

                    They only counted recyclable bottles as single use if discarded anywhere but a recycling center assuming they may or may not be recycled so they assume it’s trash until it’s recycled or degraded.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        I’ve yet to see a reusable plastic milk bottle. The glass bottle pictured is literally one that you return to the store for a deposit and they return to the dairy, where it gets sterilised and reused. These are quite common where I live, and the plastic alternative is single-use “recyclable” plastic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Except for the past 100 years glass recycling and re-use has been a net loss, on who pays for it, who wants to do it, who still just throws stuff out, and how it’s implemented. Back in the 70’s, when soda was in glass, something like 3% of the bottles were being returned.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 month ago

      If you have single use bottles, aluminum like soda cans is lowest impact. But any reusable solution (meal, plastic, or glass) is much much better.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            a lot less. we’re talking ~2 microns (ie: 2 micrometers or 0.002mm). For context, the width of an “average” human hair ranges from 18 to 180 microns (there’s a lot of variability due to age, ethnicity, and lifestyle).

            If you want to see for yourself, you can dissolve the aluminum to leave just the lining (scrub any paint off the outside of the can first). You can use a solution with pH either lower than 3 or higher than 12.5. For context, draino is about 12 on the pH scale, and coca-cola is about 2.5, but the closer you are to neutral, the longer it will take (so while you could theoretically use the soda inside the can, that will take quite a while). There are sulfuric acid drain cleaners that get down into the 1 to 2 pH range (though note that pH is a log scale, so that’s on the order of 10 to 100 times more acidic than the cola and will fuck your shit up if you aren’t careful).

            For whatever you choose to use, be sure to look up safe handling and disposal recommendations before attempting, or simply watch this youtube video instead!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            Sure, but it’s plastic in addition to the aluminium can. Might be better overall but not exactly ground breaking ecologically speaking.

            Must be profitable, though, or they would have disappeared