I just want to make funny Pictures.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1619 hours ago

    Why not sell it? Pet Rocks were sold.

    Why not claim it’s yours? You wrote the prompt. See Pet Rocks above.

    Because, unlike pet rocks, AI generated art is often based on the work of real people without attribution or permission, let alone compensation.

    Not use it and instead hire a professional? That argument died with photography. Don’t take a photo, hire a painter!

    So what if AI art is low quality. Not every product needs to be art.

    Do you know what solidarity is? Any clue at all?

    Seems like the concept is completely alien to you, so here you go:

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      719 hours ago

      Copyright and intellectual property is a lie cooked up by capitalists to edge indie creators out of the market.

      True solidarity is making AI tools and freely sharing them with the world. Not all AIs are locked down by corporations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        517 hours ago

        Those capitalists support AI because it would allow them to further cut out all creators from the market. If you want solidarity, support artists against the AI being used to replace them.

        • Pennomi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          215 hours ago

          Please explain to me how open source AI allows a corporation to cut creators out of the market.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      316 hours ago

      Do you know what solidarity is?

      Do you know what a luddite is?

      The simplest argument, supported by many painters and a section of the public, was that since photography was a mechanical device that involved physical and chemical procedures instead of human hand and spirit, it shouldn’t be considered an art form;

      https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/History_of_Photography_as_Fine_Art#:~:text=The simplest argument%2C supported by,in common with fabrics produced

      That a particular AI could have used copywrited work is a completely different argument than what was first stated.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 hours ago

        Do you know what a false equivalence is? If not, just reread your own comment for a fucking perfect example.

        I’m not wasting any more time and effort trying to explain the blindingly obvious to your willfully obtuse ass. Have the day you deserve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1218 hours ago

        Yeah, nothing is more bougie than independent artists, most of whom are struggling to make ends meet even WITH a day job… 🙄

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        917 hours ago

        Says the person supporting capitalist corporations pushing AI as a replacement for real human artwork?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        315 hours ago

        I agree, except you’re the one showing solidarity with the bourgeoisie.
        AI is a too of the bourgeoisie to suppress the working class

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        316 hours ago

        Ah yes, how dare artists make $5 an hour instead of $0 while you pay a corporation a subscription fee instead. That’ll show those lazy artists that they’ve had it too good for too long.