• Vodulas [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    22 months ago

    People that would not buy the game that will pirate it once it is cracked vs people that could not wait and just bought instead of pirating it. The people that would wait until it is cracked would pirate it immediately if it was cracked before the 3 months but will also wait to pirate it if it is not cracked in that 3 months.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      People that would not buy the game that will pirate it once it is cracked

      That wouldn’t cause a loss of revenue. Which only leaves

      people that could not wait and just bought instead of pirating it

      Which was my point.

      • Vodulas [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        No, you said:

        I guess that puts to rest the “I wasn’t going to buy that game anyway…” nonsense.

        My point is that there are still people that were never going to buy the game outside that 20% of lost revenue.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          My point is that there are still people that were never going to buy the game outside that 20% of lost revenue.

          My point is, that doesn’t matter. Will there be people pirating games that never would have purchased otherwise? Absolutely. Any game is a good value for $0. But many people use this argument as some sort of mental gymnastics to justify pirating. I’m just saying, the OP is evidence that that argument is bullshit. Many many people will choose to pirate rather than paying for a game they want to play.

          • Vodulas [they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            Sure, but it doesn’t blow the statement out of the water. You would have to find out how many times a game was pirated, then compare that to the extra copies sold that make up that 20%. Plus, not everyone who pirates games says that.