Google is weakening ad blockers as part of their MV3 extension standard and this will trickle down into all Chromium browsers. Built in ad blockers lack features compared to uBlock Origin as well.

      • babybus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Mozilla is now focusing on the advertising business.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          231 month ago

          To reduce reliance on Google… With the goal to change how advertising works, less annoying, less asshole ads would benefit everyone.

          • babybus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s not my browser’s job to report to advertisers, period.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              101 month ago

              Its not doing that, you can use a fork if you want, or, and that would be the important part, put a condom over your internet cable before it enters the router, safety first.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Mozilla is mostly funded by google. With the current cookie laws from the eu to try and stop user tracking, they developed a new solution together.

        Both chrome and firefox analyze your behaviour on your pc/phone/device. Then instead of giving websites the right ads, your browser tells every website you visit (with such ads) about you. You can google “privacy sandbox” if you’d like to know more.

        So you better not be gay in a place like iraq, and be in need of using your school’s website on a personal computer.

    • Vanon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      Unfortunately, your statement probably only deserves bothsides.jxl. Please attempt to honestly and objectively compare things, despite the personal inconvenience.

      They make mistakes, but Firefox and Mozilla are obviously nowhere near as fucked up as Chrome and Google by any measure. And Firefox would only improve if people stopped running back to Chrome when something was not perfect.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        430 days ago

        As for that context you’re missing, I’m counting them as equally bad because they run the same privacy violating approach to tracking user data and putting it where it shouldn’t go

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        230 days ago

        Maybe actually read or ask for context. I didn’t include it in the comment because I figured that people who care enough to ask would ask

      • asudox
        link
        fedilink
        129 days ago

        Pretend privacy or anti privacy

        I’d say they both are bad except pretend privacy is much worse.

    • asudox
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      Unfortunate that people are fooled by Mozilla’s pretend privacy promises.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s not like we have great options here. Safari isn’t supported on Windows or Linux. Opera has its own issues (like predatory loan apps) even if you’re willing to pay for it. Crossing my fingers that Ladybird will work out, but it has a long way to go (though it did better than I thought it would when I tried it a few months back). Everything else is some variant of Chrome.

        If you need to be on the web at all, Firefox still seems like the best of the shit pile.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          There’s also the Firefox forks like Zen and Floorp. It’s still early days for Zen, but it’s looking promising.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Not just that, not everyone who was listed in their open letters apparently agreed to or knew they were in them