Sjmarf to Programming [email protected] • 1 month agomallocPlusAIsh.itjust.worksmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1254
arrow-up1254imagemallocPlusAIsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to Programming [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•1 month agoYou don’t need to cast the return value from malloc.
minus-squareSubverblinkfedilink6•edit-21 month agoThis isn’t malloc though. I have to assume the cast is because the user has experience with the output from an LLM being untrustworthy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agothat is besides the point. You can still call malloc, it will still return void*, and it would still reqoire casting in c++
You don’t need to cast the return value from malloc.
This isn’t malloc though. I have to assume the cast is because the user has experience with the output from an LLM being untrustworthy.
you do in c++, no?
In c++ you should use
new
.that is besides the point. You can still call malloc, it will still return void*, and it would still reqoire casting in c++