Sjmarf to Programming [email protected] • 4 days agomallocPlusAIsh.itjust.worksmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1251
arrow-up1251imagemallocPlusAIsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to Programming [email protected] • 4 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•4 days agoYou don’t need to cast the return value from malloc.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 days agothat is besides the point. You can still call malloc, it will still return void*, and it would still reqoire casting in c++
minus-squareSubverblinkfedilink6•edit-23 days agoThis isn’t malloc though. I have to assume the cast is because the user has experience with the output from an LLM being untrustworthy.
You don’t need to cast the return value from malloc.
you do in c++, no?
In c++ you should use
new
.that is besides the point. You can still call malloc, it will still return void*, and it would still reqoire casting in c++
This isn’t malloc though. I have to assume the cast is because the user has experience with the output from an LLM being untrustworthy.