The company behind Trump Watches prominently features an iconic image of the presidential candidate on its timepieces. There’s one big problem: It’s not allowed to.

According to the Associated Press, though, TheBestWatchesonEarth LLC advertised a product it can’t deliver, as that image is owned by the 178-year-old news agency. This week, the AP told WIRED it is pursuing a cease and desist against the LLC, which is registered in Sheridan, Wyoming. (The company did not reply to a request for comment about the cease and desist letter.)

Evan Vucci, the AP’s Pulitzer Prize–winning chief photographer, took that photograph, and while he told WIRED he does not own the rights to that image, the AP confirmed earlier this month in an email to WIRED that it is filing the written notice. “AP is proud of Evan Vucci’s photo and recognizes its impact,” wrote AP spokesperson Nicole Meir. “We reserve our rights to this powerful image, as we do with all AP journalism, and continue to license it for editorial use only.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I hate trump but I hate copyright law way more.

    Ugh… Go trump … pukes

    EDit: so many people are malding lmao. Even got boneheaded DMS ヾ(⌐■_■)ノ

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      691 month ago

      Do you also hate the wishes of the artist who sold it to the news agency to earn a living and keep the image under editorial use as opposed to being commercialized and sold to benefit the Trump campaign? Whether you agree with how it’s being used or not, that’s what the photographer decided was best for their work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Copyright laws are bullshit in that their terms are way too long and are often too easily abused against people who are using copywritten materials under fair use. However copyright as a concept is not bullshit. Creative works, including photography, should absolutely be protected from unauthorized use for the benefit of the creator.

      Also, there is nothing redeemable about Trump. Even if you feel that copyright law is somehow fundamentally wrong, the correct position can actually be “fuck all parties involved” instead of supporting Trump hawking his swag to pay for his campaign of fascism.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        101 month ago

        I really wish copyright was still how it was in the U.S. for more than the first half of the 20th century: 19 years with an option to renew for another 19 years. That, IMO, is long enough for any entity to be the sole earner from a work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        However copyright as a concept is not bullshit. Creative works, including photography, should absolutely be protected from unauthorized use for the benefit of the creator.

        Sure, creative works should be protected. But not all works are creative enough to be protected. I disagree a photograph like this should have any protection. If the photographer put in their creativity or something else to create it then sure. Then it should be protected. This photo was taken on public event of people and stuff out of the photographers influence and IMO shouldn’t be protected

        • WxFisch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          201 month ago

          The creativity is in how the photo was shot; the camera settings, framing, when the photographer chose to take the photo, etc. To say that anyone could have taken this exact photo is both incorrect and doesn’t matter. Anyone could have written any book, play, or script but they didn’t. Anyone could have painted pretty much any particular painting, but they didn’t. I don’t disagree that many aspects of US copyright law are ridiculous, but to say there’s no artistic vision in taking a photograph like this is ignorant.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            I agree. It would be like a composer who couldn’t play an instrument writing a symphony. Just because he doesn’t have the capability to produce the final outcome doesn’t mean his vision for how the various pieces fit together isn’t an artistry in itself.

            That is a very powerful image, moreso than many of the other images I’ve seen of that event. It certainly isn’t because of the people in it, but the timing to capture that gesture and the overall framing add something that is lacking in other pictures I’ve seen. No doubt that is the reason they selected it. Now they will have to use a lesser option.

        • erin (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          81 month ago

          I think the other comment covered it but I believe this demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes photography such an amazing artform. People study and practice, for a long time, to take photos like this. This isn’t a cell phone pointed in the general direction of a subject with conveniently optimal lighting for its tiny lens, though that could produce a good picture, this takes a great deal more experience, preparation, and creativity to frame and capture the subject in a certain way with extraordinary timing to get a dynamic, emotion-filled result.

    • @stonerboner
      link
      211 month ago

      Ummm… no. Copyright law sucks, but it’s really the only protection for artists/writers/etc. in this case, Trump sucks way worse than copyright law lmao.

      He’s literally stealing someone’s work and attempting to make money off it as his own.

      Yet you say “Go Trump.” Copyright law is all it takes for you to publicly support a fascist. Absolutely amazing.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        Sadly, copyright doesn’t even truly protect this artist, it protects the corporation that the artist works for. And THAT is one massive reason why copyright is bullshit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 month ago

          Without copyright, the artist would be unemployed. Because the corporation he now works for could just take his photos without paying him.

          Copyright protects his livelihood. And THAT is one massive reason why copyright is necessary.

          • @stonerboner
            link
            41 month ago

            Correct. There are major flaws and rampant abuse; it truly needs reform. But it absolutely needs to exist and benefit those that create.

            Its kind of weird for them to take the fascist thief’s side in pretty much anything

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Many corporations force you to sign away your work when working for them, so what you describe is already happening.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              “When working for them” means “when they pay you”. The point is that the corporation must financially compensate the artist. That’s how copyright makes art into a livelihood.

              Without copyright, corporations can use art without ever paying the artist at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yet you say “Go Trump.” Copyright law is all it takes for you to publicly support a fascist. Absolutely amazing.

        Yep, his watch completely erased any wrong he did and now I am full-on maga train. Isn’t it so great that things are so simple ? You could say white and black :)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah I guess I am.

        I also support Ukraine so that makes me Nazi. And Palestine too so i am antisemite…

        Edit; I also like killing unborn babies

        I am very fucked up ヾ(⌐■_■)ノ

        • Ech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 month ago

          No. Just the Trump thing. Conflating that with anything else you said is a very weird bit of normalization for the former.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        Your priorities are fucked if you are able to even type those two words [“Go” and “Trump”] next to each other.

        “Go Trump yourself”

        “Go Trump to hell”

        “Go Trump off a bridge”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 month ago

      I disagree with you, but wanted to be unlike the other comments. I, too, hate copyright, but in this case I’d say Trump deserves to lose, just cause he’s a cunt, and winning this will do basically nothing for anyone except him.