You can’t really gauge its Steam reviews because there are only 13(!) total so far, reflective of a game that has launched with just a few hundred players. 224, as I’m writing this article. Sub-Concord levels. Yes. Concord is a unit of measurement now.

The Concord legacy lives on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 month ago

    Besides the actual quality of the game, it seems like (stupid) people are complaining about DEI in this game? Why?

    People are the worst.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 month ago

      From what I know Sweet Baby Inc. is involved. Which is a studio that focuses a lot on DEI when it comes to narratives/story in games.

      They already did not have the greatest track record, some good games, but a lot of mediocre and even bad games. It doesn’t necessarily mean that the game scores are related to DEI, but the fact it keeps happening to games they’re involved with says at least something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 month ago

        The good games they’ve worked on have included some of the most praised games in recent years. If you want to ask why this keeps happening, you have to have massive blinders on to ignore the likes of God of War: Ragnarok and Alan Wake II, both firmly in recent memory, and also realize that basically no writer on earth could save something like Suicide Squad from its criticisms.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 month ago

          Like I said, some good games. Which by the way still received criticism from people about certain DEI related involvements, whether you agree or disagree with that is different thing, but the criticism was there too.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            20
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Anything not about straight white men will have people complaining about DEI bullshit. It’s never a reason a game has failed. They fail because they’re bad games. They might also include DEI stuff, but it’s not the cause.

            Edit: correction, those games listed are about straight white men. Anything that includes a character that is not a straight white man will have those people complaining. They’re the most fragile people in the world.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 month ago

        What does “focuses on DEI” even mean? That it has non-white people?

        Some stories don’t have straight, white people. That doesn’t mean there’s some agenda going on.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 month ago

          It means exactly what DEI is. So yeah, predominantly focusing on non-white people and non-straight people.

          They are a studio that consults on specifically this in games they’re collaborating with.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 month ago

            They are contract writers for hire, and you have been misled, either intentionally or unintentionally, by the YouTubers you follow. Both Sweet Baby and their clients have denied this interpretation of what they do.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              10
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Not sure what I’m being misled over? It literally says on Wikipedia as well:

              Sweet Baby Inc. is a Canadian narrative development and consultation studio based in Montreal. Founded by former Ubisoft developers, including scriptwriter Kim Belair and product manager David Bédard, the company consults on video game narratives during development to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion within game narratives and studios.

              Also, in every game they’ve worked on it’s quite obvious which part they’ve been involved with, based on the above.

              But people on this sub really just like to keep shooting the messenger huh 🙄

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                7
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                You know that in the wake of Suicide Squad and Saga from Alan Wake II, they stated quite clearly that what was “obviously” their contributions were totally wrong, with Remedy confirming on their end? It may not be inaccurate to state that sensitivity reading or consulting for authenticity when writing diverse characters are services that they offer, but their contributions to each game are not itemized. It’s like when a bad port happens and people see Iron Galaxy in the credits, they want to see this pattern of Iron Galaxy being responsible rather than <beloved creator of game you like> and then throw out any evidence of Iron Galaxy actually being a really good port studio. I get that you want to form patterns of why something you perceive to be wrong is happening, but the truth is that these companies’ contributions are not itemized, because video games work more like a traditional business than Hollywood, and it’s no one’s policy to break out which work was done by a contractor versus in-house, so you’ll actually never know. Instead, Endymion, or whoever it is you watch that picked up on the week’s trending rage bait topic, cosplays as a journalist and infers a whole lot of what Sweet Baby does that they just didn’t do, whereas an actual journalist would get quotes from sources to confirm that it’s true.

      • ElectricMachman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 month ago

        Diversity, equality, and inclusion. All very terrible things, as you can see…

    • Mellow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What is the actual quality of the game?

      Did you know about this game? Did you buy and play this game? Did you actually like this game?

      Are you one of the ~220 people who bought this game and didn’t spread the word to their friends.

      It sounds to me like this game sucks. Maybe it was rotten from the start. Maybe they were forced to hire a bunch of mentally ill people with a massive chip on their shoulder to ‘advise’ and change the game to tick some boxes on a list. ( don’t you just love having fun according to a list of prescribed requirements? ) I bet the people working on it like that. Talk about a soul sucking job without passion. We will probably never know the truth.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You’re parroting the line of dumb conspiracy theories known as Gamergate 2 pushed by a bunch of grifters farming engagement on YouTube.

        Narrative consultancy companies like SBI don’t force you to hire them, and if you choose to hire them, you don’t have to follow all of their advice.

        If you’re interesting in curing yourself of the mindworms the YouTube algorithm has planted in your brain, please check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGmESJM6BFQ