• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You’re only thinking in terms of labor. Nepotism, inheritance, gives many a head start in terms of building capital. Removing these people from the market place would allow a more even playing field where actual ability would push people into higher levels of management and improve efficiencies for people who participate at lower levels of production.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        I think inheritance should be allowed. I just think there should be restrictions on how they participate in the market.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          I’m not talking about inheritance though. I’m talking about when a farm takes on a family member as the new management. Because that’s literally nepotism.

          (Without getting too much into semantics, isn’t headhunting a new boss at a company a type of nepotism? As in, there wasn’t a competitive process, they were hand-picked by the board / CEO. Is “nepotism” only meant specifically where someone’s incompetence is overlooked because of family relationship? If they’re actually the best person for the job is that still nepotism?)

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            How about instead of trying to poke holes and narrowing your argument down to the exact exchange in a different implementation of capitalism that we see here in the US and consider the actual question.