@[email protected] to Ask [email protected] • 2 months agoIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?message-square46fedilinkarrow-up1147file-text
arrow-up1147message-squareIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?@[email protected] to Ask [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish44•2 months agohttps://youtu.be/uAKMolRKphE?si=T7SS0saI_GFQtdrj Derek Guy breaks it down some in this podcast. But it was a shift in the house of commons in England as it was working Man’s clothing and was a way to signal you were with the people and not aristocracy.
https://youtu.be/uAKMolRKphE?si=T7SS0saI_GFQtdrj
Derek Guy breaks it down some in this podcast. But it was a shift in the house of commons in England as it was working Man’s clothing and was a way to signal you were with the people and not aristocracy.
Boy did that work out.