Dot. to World [email protected]English • 18 hours agoNetflix Wiped Most of Its “Palestinian Stories” Collection — and Erased the Whole Thing in Israel.theintercept.commessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1517cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1517external-linkNetflix Wiped Most of Its “Palestinian Stories” Collection — and Erased the Whole Thing in Israel.theintercept.comDot. to World [email protected]English • 18 hours agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaregranolabarlinkfedilink19•16 hours agoYou are actually not wrong but if they dont obey BoD, it is the shed. Bigger question here if this “simplification” is a valid tactic to communicate the message. Theoretically BoD could sue the CEO, but i dont think that ever happened in this context… Only in cases of fraud, ie stealing company assets
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•8 hours agoSomething similar has happened. Look up Dodge vs. Ford Motor Co where the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that a ceo must operate in the interest of the shareholders not in the interests of the business and it’s employees.
You are actually not wrong but if they dont obey BoD, it is the shed.
Bigger question here if this “simplification” is a valid tactic to communicate the message.
Theoretically BoD could sue the CEO, but i dont think that ever happened in this context… Only in cases of fraud, ie stealing company assets
Something similar has happened. Look up Dodge vs. Ford Motor Co where the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that a ceo must operate in the interest of the shareholders not in the interests of the business and it’s employees.