• jawa21
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the hiway.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1128 days ago

        Peregrine falcons FTL…

        (There’s this fat fucker that hunts off our building’s rooftop. It waits for a pigeon to strike the neighboring buildings windows and scoops them up. Some how it’s reassuring to know that humans aren’t the only lazy animals. Peregrine are freaking cool though.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          That’s smart predator behavior! Cull the stupid and injured. Save energy and reduce risk. Live long and prosper.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            327 days ago

            Yes, it is.

            I just wish the neighbors building wasn’t so prone to window strikes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              227 days ago

              There might be a way to fix that. Determine whether the glass is invisible or mirrored (or becomes so, as the sun moves). If it’s males attacking “rivals,” letting light shine out might help. If it looks like you could fly through it, closing blinds might help. The neighbors might be willing to try, if they’re tired of being startled by thumping birds.

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                327 days ago

                Yup. Unfortunately…. They don’t care. The only reason they’d consider it would be to reduce the window cleaning bill.

                At least Hank gets something out of it; (yup. We’ve nicknamed the chonker Hank The Tank)

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Ages ago, there was a time where my dad would mail back up tapes for offsite storage because their databases were large enough that it was faster to put it through snail mail.

      It should also be noted his databases were huge, (they’d be bundled into 70 pound packages and shipped certified.)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        828 days ago

        Just a couple of years ago I was sent a dataset by mail, around 1TB on a hard drive.

        Later I worked on visualization of large datasets, we didn’t have the space to store them locally because they were up to a PB.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          528 days ago

          We’re storing data in peanut butter? Please tell me there’s jam involved.

          /j it’s amazing we’re talking about petabytes. My first computer had like 600 meg. (Pentium 486 cobbled out of spare- old- parts from my dad’s junk”Parts” rack.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            428 days ago

            😁 ya my first “computer” was a ZX-81 with 1kB of ram, type too much and it was full! A card with a whopping 16kB later came to the rescue.

            It’s been a wild time in history.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Mail dataset in standard-compliant way. Like RFC1149. Don’t forget that carrier should be avian carrier.

          we didn’t have the space to store them locally because they were up to a PB.

          Local is very vague word. It can be argued, that anything, that doesn’t fit into L1 cache is not local.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            127 days ago

            Local as not in the building in that case :-)

            RFC1149 lol yeah wasn’t that a norwegian experiment at some sub-bits per second? Thanks for making me remember!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      428 days ago

      Awesome bandwidth to be sure, but I do think there is a difference between data transfer to RAM (such as network traffic) vs. traffic purely from one location to another (station wagon with tapes/747 with SD cards/etc.).

      For the latter, actually using the data in any meaningful way is probably limited to read time of the media, which is likely slow.

      But yeah, my go-to would be micro SD cards on a plane :)

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        328 days ago

        Well, it depends on the purpose of the data. If it’s meant as an offsite backup… well… you’re probably it driving them just down the street anyway.