• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3313 hours ago

    Wot? They didn’t say they cheated, they said they kept a copy of the prompt at the top of their document while working.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Any use of an LLM in understanding any subject or create any medium, be it papers or artwork, results in intellectual failure, as far as I’m concerned. Imagine if this were a doctor or engineer relying on hallucinated information, people could die.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        There are workflows using LLMs that seem fair to me, for example

        • using an LLM to produce a draft, then
        • Editing and correcting the LLM draft
        • Finding real references and replacing the hallucinated ones
        • Correcting LLM style to your style

        That seems like more work than doing it properly, but it avoids some of the sticking points of the proper process

      • AWildMimicAppears
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        there is no LLM involved in ryven’s comment:

        • open assignment
        • select text
        • copy text
        • create text-i-will-turn-in.doc
        • paste text without formatting
        • work in this document, scrolling up to look at the assignment again
        • fall for the “trap” and search like an idiot for anything relevant to assignment + frankie hawkes, since no formatting

        i hope noone is dependent on your reading comprehension mate, or i’ll have some bad news

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1911 hours ago

        You’re a fucking moron and probably a child. They’re telling a story from long before there were public LLMs.