• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Perhaps, but the prevalence of single family homes is a huge problem itself. They generally bring in less in tax dollars than they cost the city to maintain, since it’s more road, sidewalk, sewer, etc. for one household. My tax dollars as someone who lives in a multifamily building subsidize others in my city who have one household on much larger properties. I don’t want these people to have more tax breaks and incentivize more of that to be built.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      This is a huge problem with suburban devlopments (single family homes, strip malls, box stores). Almost all of them rely on denser parts of the cities to maintain themselves. Unlike the denser parts of cities, the commercial zoning often struggles when the original business leaves, unlike denser areas that are more flexible. Not only do these developments cost more to build and maintain, they often don’t provide for as long and can be costly/resistant to redevelpment due to suburban zoning and NIMBYism.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      My tax dollars for a single family home are far above that paid for a tiny apartment, and that’s as it should be

    • @Ilikepornaddict
      link
      -151 year ago

      So your solution is to cram us all into sardine cans?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        There’s a wealth of options between suburban sprawl and 50 story towers of 300 sqft apartments.

        https://missingmiddlehousing.com/

        Further: legalizing density doesn’t mean that you personally are forced into them. There will always be a market for detached single family homes, especially if you don’t value being in a city anyway.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          I agree an apartment building is nothing but a glorified can.

          And its sucks

          The guy above you, below you or next to you has a sub woofer going? Yeah you have to listen to it.

          Have a home? Not anywhere near the issue.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Yeah but we’re ok with making sardine cans out of wood now, because who needs sound proofing. It’ll make housing cheaper

        • @Ilikepornaddict
          link
          -61 year ago

          Yes, I refuse to ever live in a can, not being able to simply open my door and go for a walk. Trying to force that on people is cruel.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Nobody is forcing anything stop with the fake hysteria. it’s ok to make it legal to build apartments in more places if people want to.

            • @Ilikepornaddict
              link
              -21 year ago

              Is that not what started this whole conversation? Someone claiming single family homes are bad and shouldn’t be built?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                No, it wasn’t. They were saying the TAXING STRUCTURE for single family homes NEAR CITIES or close suburbs is bad. Single family homes out in the country or in smaller towns are fine. The density isn’t needed there. Single family homes in suburbs could be fine, if the taxes paid for denser housing that is needed to support a larger city. People in New York are able to live in the city because of dense housing availability or easy access to commuter trains to get farther out where less dense housing exists. People in Los Angeles/Houston/Atlanta don’t have great public transport options AND don’t have much high density housing, so the sprawl is horrendous (along with the associated car traffic). If the taxes for single family homes in Los Angeles were higher than for condos/townhouses, then the city could fund either higher density housing (which are actually banned by local zoning laws in some neighborhoods, since nobody wants an apartment building next to their single family home) or better public transport for people living farther out of the city.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Lol are you my wife? She’s like, “We need space so we’re not looking into the neighbor’s windows.”

        And 100% of the time, I think she’s implicitly opting to pay an additional 2-3 hundred thousand dollars (where we are) just to be on an .5 acres of land, living on 15% of that half acre, and utilizing like 5% of it on a daily basis.

        We don’t need that much space. We shouldn’t be laid on top of one another like sardines in a can, but we also don’t need to waste as much space as we do for real comfort and fake status. There’s a lot of transformation between the urban dispersion of the Southwest (where I live and everything is far away from everything else) and the urban density of Manhattan.

        • @Ilikepornaddict
          link
          41 year ago

          So your wife sees at as simply a status thing it sounds like, that is stupid. I need space because I have dogs, I like to have backyard parties, and I genuinely think I would hate my life if I opened my front door into a hallway.

          I also hate big cities. Anything over 20k is too much population for my liking.