• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    There is no free will because who, what and where you are conditions you to make a certain choice every single time, and there is no will external to all that what you are and you experienced so far.

    It’s kinda related to the multiverse theory, where every choice or chance creates a new version of reality and if you had made another choice it wouldn’t be YOU.

    At least that’s what they argue. I also think of it this way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      When you phrase it that way, though, it makes the ‘you’ part stand out and in that regard you do have free will to do as you choose, it’s just an internal lack of ‘ethereal choices’ we’re lacking. The fact that if the choice were somehow “replayed”, you would make the same choice is kind of meaningless since we don’t experience that….the point at the quantum/chaos theory level is that there is no way to look at the current set of circumstances and say with any degree of certainty what your decision will be. Whether this involves some magic autonomy ‘above’ the chemical and quantum nature of your brain is just semantics as far as whether we’re the one ultimately in the drivers seat or whether we’re just experiencing things from what appears to be behind the wheel. Maybe think of it as sitting on the lap of the universe while we pretend to hit the gas and shift the gears.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        It depends on the context of the conversation though. Free will and whether or not it exists has massive implications on aspects of society like criminality and the justice system.

        If we have the statistics showing the crime tracks with poverty, lack of education, etc. and we don’t believe that that person is making a real “choice” in their actions, then we have to reflect on what purpose punishing them is even serving. The idea of punishment as retribution, or punishment beyond reforming them becomes nonsensical. You can imagine removing someone for the safety of others, but punishment for the sake of moral punishment or salvation (as advocated by many religious types) makes no sense.