• GladiusB
    link
    fedilink
    47 hours ago

    They can tell who votes. Your entire premise is based on a belief that votes are anonymous. They aren’t. They are pretected from the public. If you have ever worked in election, which I have, you would know that. You have to cross reference if someone voted twice, are alive, or even registered in the county they voted in. There are computers that verify electronic bullets and there are batch audits. No one is ever allowed to be alone even with one ballet. Everything is done in a team. If your partner calls in sick, you’re the third wheel to another team.

    Just because the public doesn’t know doesn’t mean the government doesn’t know.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 minutes ago

      Votes are anonymous. You can tell who voted, but not what they voted for. It’s crucial for the fairness of elections that a vote cannot be definitively connected to the individual who cast it; if you could, you could coerce or retaliate.

      And all of the things you mention are the trust OP is talking about. You were a trusted person in that situation. The process increases and validates trust.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 hours ago

      That’s basically what was being said and it’s not functionally different because the vast majority of the public does not work in elections or their verification. In essence if 99% of the population does not have access to data or cannot interpret said data, trust is needed.