Peanut, who has amassed more than half a million Instagram followers, was euthanized by officials to be tested for rabies.

Peanut, the Instagram-famous squirrel that was seized from its owner’s home Wednesday, has been euthanized by New York state officials.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation took Peanut, as well as a raccoon named Fred, on Wednesday after the agency learned the animals were “sharing a residence with humans, creating the potential for human exposure to rabies," it said in a joint statement with the Chemung County Department of Health.

Both Peanut and Fred were euthanized to test for rabies, the statement said. It was unclear when the animals were euthanized.

  • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    My squirrel moment. Kill these heartless bureaucratic fuckers. It is a human filth that doesn’t belong to the civilised world

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2419 days ago

      Unfortunately the animal bit a person, so they had no real choice in the matter. There is no reliable way to test for rabies without killing the animal, and vaccines are not guaranteed to prevent spreading infection.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        This is such fucking bullshit, so you corner an animal, it bites you, then you shoot the animal because it bit you?

        I hope you never own or work with animals.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          No, you surgically remove the animal’s brain tissue to test for rabies and ascertain whether more serious treatment is required for the bitten. It should also be noted that the animals were never vaccinated themselves, because even if a provider were in the area the man with the animals was never certified as a rescue and rehab after seven years.

          Handing over the animals safely and with minimal harm would be the handlers responsibility, the inspector being bitten is the fault of the handler.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          219 days ago

          AFAIK no, just the squirrel is confirmed, if I were in charge I would have quarantined Fred to look for signs of sickness and then shipping it to a proper rescue.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            619 days ago

            Unfortunately quarantine and observation isn’t effective as a testing strategy for animals, the disease can progress at different rates and it’s possible for infected animals to show no symptoms. As rabies can’t be treated after symptoms start showing, they can’t take the time to do this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              118 days ago

              Well yeah I’m sure the rescue would quarantine him even longer, I just wanted to reduce handling of a potentially sick animal to a minimum. Plus, by then, results on the squirrel would have come back and give us another hint on the possibility of Fred being sick.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                117 days ago

                Sadly the only way to know for sure is to test brain tissue, including in people, so there’s no way to be certain without killing the potentially infected animal/person.

                There are a bunch of tests they can do for people that can potentially identify rabies (lumbar puncture, CT and MRI scans, skin biopsy, antibody test) but apparently it can still be easily missed even with all of these tests so they aren’t enough for an accurate diagnoses.