• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird…

      It’s the best read of it I can manage though…

    • Fushuan [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 days ago

      I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write “you would be my bitches”. Not polite, MAGA polite.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      318 days ago

      Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

      I don’t know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it’s because I’m not into any sketchy shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          218 days ago

          Oh…yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

          At least with mistress’s and partners consent is a key factor.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

            It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage