• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Hypothesis: the message seems to imply that the cliche nature lover needs to trample and destroy said nature to be close to it.

      This seems the most likely explanation to me.

      And I find it neither funny nor insightful.

      Edit: I can’t manage to copy paste usernames on mobile but please check out the refinement by the comment to this post. Highly valuable edition. Tldr of it: not “nature lovers” in general but social media invasive nature lovers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 hours ago

        It’s not so much nature lovers but social media “content creators” who are criticized here.

        There was a case I read of a man caring for a beautiful patch of flowers, but then it got famous on social media and those assholes went there in buses, took pictures lying in there and destroyed it. Heartbreaking to read about that one. Sadly I can’t find that specific case anymore, but there are enough articles about the problem, like this one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4715 hours ago

      Few people understand why I glare them after obliterating a perfectly nice patch of flowers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1312 hours ago

      I weirdly see a lot of these “yes…but…” Comics everywhere and I don’t get like 90% of them tbh.