• Anti-Face Weapon
    link
    fedilink
    718 days ago

    It’s less of a legal distinction and more of a definition thing. He is objectively using the wrong word.

    It would not be incorrect to refer to the people of Puerto Ricans as a nation by the definition of the word. The word nation does not refer to a place but a group of people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Both words refer to both concepts.

      country

      1. A nation or state.
      2. The territory of a nation or state; land.
      3. The people of a nation or state; populace.

      nation

      1. A relatively large group of people organized under a single, usually independent government; a country.
      2. The territory occupied by such a group of people.
      3. The government of a sovereign state.
      • Anti-Face Weapon
        link
        fedilink
        117 days ago

        This definition is not fully correct. A nation does not need to have a government. For example the Kurds

          • Anti-Face Weapon
            link
            fedilink
            117 days ago

            Kurdistan doesn’t really have a central government like that, nor fixed or well defined borders. Keep in mind that the concept of a “Nation State” is really only a couple hundred years old.

            If that counterexample doesn’t satisfy you, then Somalia should. It is a country without a functioning government, which has two nations inside of them of the northern and southern Somalians which are completely different, and neither of which have any sort of unifying government.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              116 days ago

              That’s your point though, isn’t it?

              The “people” and the “territory” are not the same thing, but both words “country” and “nation” are used more or less interchangeably to apply to either.