• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    57
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Broke the cycle with my son. It was insane the amount of people who didn’t even belong to a religion that this is a symptom of, who were pushy about me having it performed. If my son wants to be cut, he can make that decision for himself later in life. All of the atheists I know, were the ones that were anti-mutilation.

    • Rikudou_Sage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      If my son wants to be cut

      Why the hell would he want to? If there’s no medical reason, there’s no reason at all.

      • 6daemonbag
        link
        fedilink
        1811 months ago

        At that point, he would be an adult making a decision. It doesn’t matter why for us in regards to his choice. Maybe he becomes religious or succumbs to social pressure. He could get a Prince Albert, too, or those weird beads.

        As a parent it’s their job to protect him from harmful societal norms and religious indoctrination until he becomes an adult. Hopefully the education sticks long enough for him to deeply understand and respect his body, to seek out more helpful mentorship when needed, and pass along that education and protection to his future potential children.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -311 months ago

        Tell that to the chick who turned herself into Barbie or those twins that did… whatever it was to themselves and thought it looked anything but horrifying.

        Yes, I’m straight up saying they’re objectively ugly af. Don’t even care if that’s some kind of discrimination. They’re just dumb, they made a stupid mistake, and I don’t even think they’ve admitted it to themselves yet.

        They had every right to do it though. It was just a bad idea in every single humanly possible way.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      -3111 months ago

      I’m from muslim family but atheist and have nothing against it. Like, it is just operation that become too popular at some point. Or was forced on people to prevent an epidemy of some sort. It is still recommended across many surgeons at least as far as i know. It is just easier to recover from when you are younger. Similar to recovering from smallpox.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          -3211 months ago

          I am surprised by amount of negativity on this sub. Like it is almost impossible to have a decent conversation. People just go nuts about operation which is about hygiene. Good luck, guys. I just don’t see myself here

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2311 months ago

            Yeah, why would so many people have negative views on chopping off part of a baby’s body?

            Weird.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1611 months ago

            I’m cut, and like it that way. But your position is flawed.

            If you believe in evolution then you can agree that foreskin exists for a biological function, right? It’s not about hygiene, that’s dogma. It’s wild that it’s based in religion originally because if ‘god’ made you in his image it’s pretty fucked up to immediately alter a baby to be different.

            It’s funny when people assign the term ‘negative’ to anything they don’t want to hear about.
            You don’t have to read anything you don’t want to. Move on if you don’t have anything to contribute

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              So I actually have no dog in this fight but I read this

              If you believe in evolution then you can agree that foreskin exists for a biological function, right?

              Counterpoint: that was before “pants.”

              Good question though, most of the animal world has retractable peni, why’d we lose that ability? Now I’m curious.

              Also, shouldn’t the religious oppose it because it is fucking with “God’s creation?” Frankly them supporting it seems like flawed logic to me.

              • jerry
                link
                fedilink
                611 months ago

                No, mutations are mutations, they have no purpose, some are beneficial and are prioritized by evolution.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  311 months ago

                  So you’re saying we lost retractable penises “just because?”

                  Cause I looked into it, and it seems that since we walk upright there’s less of a chance at scraping it on the ground, so we can trade dicksheaths for extra room in our hips which would likely help moving around on two legs, which makes sense.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                311 months ago

                Let’s note here that evolution doesn’t care for “functions” or “utility” as much as it cares for “reasons”. We won’t be the first nor the last animal to get screwed in a shitty trade-off that natural selection deemed necessary. Humans are notorious for being born far more defenseless than most other mammals - evolution forced it upon us because otherwise our larger heads would kill far too many mothers.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                211 months ago

                I hadn’t even thought about pants as being a compounding factor. It seems unlikely that cavemen had better cleanliness education than we do but smegma build up would be a problem even for them… Unless underwear/pants are what cause it to build up.

            • jerry
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              It was originally the Jewish convent with God. Idk why I was sliced, but it became common in the U.S.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                It’s an oddly barbaric tradition to keep around for so long without a religious rationalization. Most circumcised Americans are not Jewish

          • Rikudou_Sage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            911 months ago

            If you’re an absolute pig that doesn’t wash his penis, yeah it’s better for hygiene. I have a better solution than chopping of your peepee, though: how about you fucking wash it?

          • dtc
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            You aren’t required to comment, but thanks for letting us know how unhappy you are here.

            Guys, its working

          • jerry
            link
            fedilink
            -511 months ago

            Atheists are angry a lot, especially young ones in the us.

            • ArxCyberwolf
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              With how much religion has damaged the world, can you really blame them?

              • jerry
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Yes and no, I was an angry atheist for a long time, now I’m a live and let live agnostic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        The smallpox analogy is false. It is a simple procedure as an adult. There is no reason to force it on people who can’t consent.

        • jerry
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Surgeons idk obstetricians absolutely do.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Wait can we say retard again? I thought that was one of the no-no words adults have been forbidden to say by other adults.