• Pennomi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3927 days ago

    I don’t think this will make much difference honestly, we already have very little regulation here. It probably means that there will be copyright exemptions for training models. And honestly eroding copyright bit by bit is okay in my book.

    What we should be worried about are the human rights that are about to be violated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2427 days ago

      “Allowing the rich and powerful to get around copyright is good, actually, because it means copyright MAY someday go away”

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        827 days ago

        I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1127 days ago

          Don’t forget the current supreme court motto though: “rules for thee but not for me”. Only massive and rich corporations will be allowed around copyright rules, but you and I and indie and open source will be held to the letter of the law.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      627 days ago

      You’re right about the regulation but I’m not so sure about the copyright exemptions. All in all, you’d think he’s more likely to side with property owners - especially the heirs of media empires - over progress.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        327 days ago

        It’s certainly true. Trump’s also close with Musk these days, and Musk certainly will pressure him to allow Grok to vacuum up all the data for free.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          327 days ago

          Musk also has his hands on a fair amount of data through X and Tesla. But yeah… Copyright expansion seems like an odd place to start breaking the constitution.